After having declared war on male and female nature, the next frontier for the extreme sexual left is to try to question and redefine sexual biology itself in favor of post-genderism.
I have maintained that the church needs to be watchful of the extremes of the secular, sexual left as it counters the encroachment of the sexual leftism into the church. The secular left is a few steps ahead of where the Christian left is headed, and the extremes of the secular left represent the more obvious pollution of the well that the Christian left has been drinking from.
Christian feminists like Amy Buckley think they are representing only the egalitarian values and ideals of “first wave” feminism and not the more obviously ugly and unbiblical second, third and fourth waves of feminism. They try to operate with a feminist-lite sloppy equality, treating a feminism as the necessary thing propping up Scripture, when they are actually breaking Scripture over the wheel of their feminism.
The nuanced, complimentary picture of men and women representing different aspects of God’s image revealed in Scripture is incompatible with the sloppy equality and mere union of physiological differences offered by Christian feminists. The Scriptural prescription for how men and women are to cherish and respect each other is incompatible with Christian feminism’s sloppy equality as the way to prevent one sex being a dictator to the other sex.
I have maintained that the church needs to be watchful of the extremes of the secular, sexual left as it counters the encroachment of the sexual leftism into the church. The secular left is a few steps ahead of where the Christian left is headed, and the extremes of the secular left represent the more obvious pollution of the well that the Christian left has been drinking from.
Christian feminists like Amy Buckley think they are representing only the egalitarian values and ideals of “first wave” feminism and not the more obviously ugly and unbiblical second, third and fourth waves of feminism. They try to operate with a feminist-lite sloppy equality, treating a feminism as the necessary thing propping up Scripture, when they are actually breaking Scripture over the wheel of their feminism.
The nuanced, complimentary picture of men and women representing different aspects of God’s image revealed in Scripture is incompatible with the sloppy equality and mere union of physiological differences offered by Christian feminists. The Scriptural prescription for how men and women are to cherish and respect each other is incompatible with Christian feminism’s sloppy equality as the way to prevent one sex being a dictator to the other sex.
No comments:
Post a Comment